¨Gang stalking¨ is a clandestine CIA operation. It is the modern version of innumerable ¨counterinsurgency¨ and ¨peacetime¨ special operations that the CIA and DoD have conducted worldwide for over half a century! The fact that this ¨pacification¨ program is now being applied to the American and world public suggests that the U.S. Government and its ¨handlers¨ (the CIA ¨Secret Team¨ and the ¨High Cabal¨ which it serves) are waging covert, low-intensity war against the people of America and the world. Wake up, y´all?
II. ETK Introduction and Conclusions
We Americans are some of the most naïve, ignorant, and duped people on the face of the earth, due in large part to the propaganda and disinformation we have been fed as ¨news¨ for generations. Most Americans today, including members of the health, mental health, and law enforcement professions, deny the reported experiences of ¨Targeted Individuals¨ (TIs), that relatively small percentage (0.1 to 1%?) of the populace whose lives are deliberately ruined in a massive covert, counterinsurgency war-espionage operation that involves most sectors of society. And yet in reading Fletcher Prouty´s ¨The Secret Team: The CIA and its Allies in Control of the United State and the World,¨ we learn that American intelligence and military forces have been engaged in just these kinds of clandestine -¨counterinsurgency¨ war operations since the 1960s! We learn that under CIA direction, the U.S. Government has deployed and is deploying these ¨peacetime operations¨ in innumerable ¨counterinsurgency list¨ countries throughout the world, including America! Today, ¨counterinsurgency list¨ nations include nearly all the nations of the world. Likewise, real and potential TIs, those individuals and groups secretly placed on various ¨terrorist watch lists¨ and systematically targeted and assaulted in clandestine ¨counterinsurgency¨ (aka ¨counterterror¨) operations may include anyone on the face of the earth.
This memorandum will be construed to comply with provisions necessary to establish presumed fact (Rule 301, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and attending State rules) should interested parties fail to rebut any given allegation or matter of law addressed herein. The position will be construed as adequate to meet requirements of judicial notice, thus preserving fundamental law. Matters addressed herein, if not rebutted, will be construed to have general application. A true and correct copy of this Public Notice is on file with and available for inspection at the newspaper responsible for publishing the instrument as legal notice. The memorandum addresses the character of the Internal Revenue Service and other agencies of the Department of the Treasury, and legal application of the Internal Revenue Code.
In 1953, the Internal Revenue Service was created by the stroke of a pen when the Secretary of the Treasury changed the name of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (T.O. No. 150-29, G.M. Humphrey, Secretary of the Treasury, July 9, 1953). However, no congressional or presidential authorization for making this change has been located, so the source of authority had to originate elsewhere. Research to which IRS officials have acquiesced suggests that the Secretary exercised his authority as trustee of Puerto Rico Trust #62 (Internal Revenue) (see 31 USC § 1321), and as will be demonstrated, the Secretary does, in fact, operate as Secretary of the Treasury, Puerto Rico.
The solid link between the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, was first published in the September 1995 issue of Veritas Magazine, based on research by William Cooper and Wayne Bentson, both of Arizona. In October, a criminal complaint was filed in the office of W. A. Drew Edmondson, attorney general for Oklahoma, against an Enid-based revenue officer, and in the time since, IRS principals have failed to refute the allegation that IRS is an agency of the Department of Treasury, Puerto Rico. In November, criminal complaints were filed simultaneously with the grand jury for the United States district court for the District of Northern Oklahoma, Tulsa, and the office of Attorney General Edmondson, and both the office of the United States Attorney and IRS principals have yet to rebut the allegations in that instance (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Kenney F. Moore, et al, 95 CR-129C).