Once you have someone’s ID Number and their DNA samples science can alter, splice, modify and remotely change anyone’s DNA through wireless technology and nanobots that are in all of us (see here).
This has been going on since the early Eugenics programs of the Jesuit controlled Rockefeller’s since before the 1900’s and the Industrial Devolution. (here)
Now, we are learning a secret coding number for all have been recorded, as hospitals are mandatorally legally binded, and paid thousands of dollars to register at Birth also used as registered stock traded on financial exchanges pledged to payment of U.S. debt from bankruptcy declared in 1934, that was never satisfied, which means the more debt the Treasury runs up (nearing $20 TRILLION!), the more each individual “ChatteL’ is owed to the Banksters still to this day.
Every child born is born into massive debt now. Every man, woman and child to be born’s current debt obligation is over $ 160,000 and will be paid back to the bankers in blood, flesh and tears.
Count on it.
What’s Your Eugenics ID Number???
But others have reported that a federal DNA database is quietly being kept on all Americans born (and has been for decades now) without their express permission, a system we get added to when our blood is taken at birth during the “routine” newborn screening examination hospitals give all newborn babies.
During this exam, the baby’s heel is pricked and the blood droplets are placed on a special card that is sent to a state government lab for testing. Parents are told this is being done to detect rare, life-threatening genetic disorders (if they are even explicitly told it is being done at all). The government authorizes millions of dollars to states for these screening programs (current legislation has authorized $20 million through 2019).
This screening is mandatory in 48 states (meaning parental permission is not required). As U.S. News reported,
While some states allow parents to opt out of government storage and use, this is not parental consent. It’s dissent. It gives government first dibs to the baby’s DNA. Consent requires a form with a signature before the sample can be stored or used for research. Surrounded by the ‘fog’ of a birth, most parents won’t opt out because they don’t even know their child’s DNA has been stored. [emphasis added]
As a parent, you aren’t asked for your consent before this sample is drawn. You can dissent, meaning after it is drawn you can opt out of the storage and use of your baby’s blood that has already been drawn by government mandate. You apparently aren’t allowed to opt out from the collecting and screening process itself.
In Carroll Quigley’s 1966 book Tragedy & Hope, he discusses bluntly how our freedom will continuously dwindle throughout the remainder of the 20th century and beyond under a type of neofeudalism imposed by the burgeoning scientific dictatorship:
Hopefully, the elements of choice and freedom may survive for the ordinary individual in that he may be free to make a choice between two opposing political groups (even if these groups have little policy choice within the parameters of policy established by the experts) and he may have the choice to switch his economic support from one large unit to another. But, in general, his freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits.
When we first read this statement, besides the oily revulsion we felt at how true his future predictions turned out to be, we couldn’t believe how accurate he was right down to our social security numbers.
But wait… was what Quigley meant by “numbered from birth” and followed “as a number” specifically referring to our SSN?
If you were not otherwise aware, there is another number assigned to each baby born in the U.S. under a separate program that came about sometime in 1948 (not too long after the National Security Act was passed). It was known at the time as the “Uniform Birth Numbering System.” It’s not a number you are openly informed about as a parent filling out a birth certificate for your baby, a certificate you are told is just “for the record.”
In fact, the most in-depth information we could find on the Uniform Birth Numbering System came from an interesting source… the March 1951 edition of Eugenical News (Vol. 36, No. 1), published by the American Eugenics Society.
Here’s the editor’s note:
Some advocates of family eugenics who have had experience in tracing pedigrees of registered animals and also know the difficulties in trying to trace many relationships in human genealogy see in the uniform birth numbering system described below some ideas which may be interesting in the future to those who want to know more about their family lines… The suggestion of eugenic use of uniform birth registration is supplementary to the uses indicated in the third paragraph of the letter printed below.
The third paragraph:
The principal innovation introduced by the uniform numbering system is the fact that each certificate will have a unique number which cannot be duplicated until one hundred years have passed [note: the year 2051]. This makes the birth certificate number a potential identity number, a positive name, which may some day make it usable not only in birth record files but in all other file and record systems which keep track of persons, their rights or their documents.
Note, the social security number had already been around at this point since 1936.
The article goes on to say, “the possibility of its use to simplify all sorts of identification problems is very interesting to all sorts of people…”
3 thoughts on “What Is Your Eugenics Universal Birth ID Number?”
Even if the implied “truths” in articles such as this have some obscure basis in fact – i.e. $160,000 per person notional debt – what they also have in common with much of our current reality is that the particulars are simply unsustainable in any practical sense of the word. In the same way that, say, contemporary agricultural or industrial habits are hitting hard limits, so too will things like hallucinated wealth and the digital abstractions of money. Sly and smart are not the same thing – don’t give the bad guys more credit than they deserve. Underwriting a new high rise in Miami Beach doesn’t demonstrate a lot of intelligence at this point in time. And, since there is now no possibility of an orderly march out of these various quagmires, the end game will be a big lethal mess. That we can count on.
We, as humans, are “unsustainable”, Western derived word.
We need to use words like “regenerational” instead implying we are going to be around, re-generate life and we are ongoing…not “Sustainable”
If you are rapidly going down the toilet, would you use the world “sustain”?
And we are all being flushed down the toilet by the PT must cease to B, IMHO.