NASA MUST DIE Part II; Rockets Do Not Ever Go Into Space

 

It is commonly believed that man will fly directly from the earth to the moon, but to do this, we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility.

It would have to develop sufficient speed to penetrate the atmosphere and overcome the earth’s gravity and, having traveled all the way to the moon, it must still have enough fuel to land safely and make the return trip to earth.

Furthermore, in order to give the expedition a margin of safety, we would not use one ship alone, but a minimum of three … each rocket ship would be taller than New York’s Empire State Building [almost ¼ mile high] and weigh about ten times the tonnage of the Queen Mary, or some 800,000 tons.”

Wernher von Braun, Father of Nazi V-2 Rockets, Father of the Apollo space program, writing in Conquest of the Moon

NASA MUST DIE

Reasons to Doubt Everything NASA

 

Mind Thought:  How much money would be freed up if NASA was completely shut down due the exposure of this massive fraud for decades perp’d on generations of the clueless sheeple who believe everything they are told and sold?

*****

The real underbelly of NASA has been the adoption of the highly advanced MKULTRA programs from the NAZI OSS prior to spawning NASA in 1958. The scientists that were brought to the U.S. under Operation Paperclip were more than just V-2 rocket-meisters, they were MKULTRA and Monarch programming progenitors.
It was crucial for the OSS-CIA to crank-up the NAZI Mind-Kontrol programs to properly grease the skids for the advent of NASA.

flash

NASA Pseudoscience Mind-Kontrol: Rockets Are DOA

~ From TheModernGnostic.com

The Penn State Physicists

For the sake of brevity, let’s utilize a peer-review source such as the physicists at Penn State University who ardently state that GRAVITY DEPENDS ON MASS AND DISTANCE AND NOTHING ELSE! This is a simple enough postulation and will serve as our benchmark.

Here are the basics why rocketry and space travel is impossible. The very first reason is the EVP (escape velocity paradox). Escape velocity is said to be 40,270 km/h (25,020 mph). This means a rocket has to reach that velocity to escape earths gravity. They tell us that the vacuum of space is the Karman Line which is 62 miles off the surface of earth. The physicists at Penn State say that GRAVITY DEPENDS ON MASS AND DISTANCE AND NOTHING ELSE. Since the launchpad is closest to the earths mass, it would need to be at escape velocity just to lift an inch off the launchpad. However, somehow gravity is able to defy it’s own definition.

Escape Velocity Paradox defies the very definition of gravity…..

wp-1454735719685

Furthermore, since the gravity is decreasing as the rocket is rising why would you need to be accelerating to escape velocity in a decreasing gravitational field?. Or is this escape velocity what’s needed to smash through the imaginary vacuum of space into weightlessness? It’s none of these, the rocket goes up, the air density decreases to the point where there is no gas (air) to push against and the rocket’s temporary buoyancy is gone. At this point, the rocket returns to earth because it cannot maintain buoyancy in one of NASA’s “states of matter”, in this case it’s gas (air).

There is no magical line that can be crossed where you suddenly become weightless. What goes up always comes down and whatever pseudoscience bullcrap NASA want’s to spin to counteract this fact go ahead, this rocket launch is D.O.A. So if the rockets don’t go into the vacuum of space where do they go? A better question would be why are launchpads always on the edge of the ocean? The answer is surprisingly simple and can be articulated with a few simple images.

curve sdfe fhfhf

*****

 indexFunny, we can send out probes to the edges of our solar system but somehow we can’t figure out a way to end starvation and famine. How is this possible!! Consider for a moment that today’s automobiles get an average of 25.8 mpg and the Model T in 1908 got between 16-25mpg. Does it make any sense that in 107 years there has been no significant increase in fuel efficiency or utilization of more efficient power sources for cars? However, NASA can send a probe (New Horizon’s) 3 billion miles to Pluto with pin point accuracy and return pristine images that look about as real as a $4 dollar bill? Does that seem plausible?

Or maybe better said “why is this even happening?”  The answer is the Jesuits and their Satanic-Khazarian-Rothschild-Freemasonic minions. NASA is many things, the least of which is a credible endeavor on behalf of science and mankind.

(more)

*****

2 thoughts on “NASA MUST DIE Part II; Rockets Do Not Ever Go Into Space

    1. yea, i was just speaking to that. The “Modern Dark Age” where critical information is available to all to discover hidden, occulted truths, yet few seem to use their eyes to see, ears to hear and minds to learn. Sad for the future of all children and sentient beings, funny how so few can fool so many for so long, ironic that in the Age of Information we are more uninformed than ever and mystic into the reasons for this Great Deception and where we head from here.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.