This is the presentation Mark Passio gave at the Tesla Science Foundation’s “Tesla’s People” conference on July 11, 2015. In this presentation, Mark explains how Tesla’s free energy technology has been covertly weaponized and used in the biggest false flag terror event of modern times on September 11, 2001.
Remember, DARPA is 25-50 years ahead of what we see in technology and they had his DEW papers since the 1920’s.
5 thoughts on “Tesla Directed Energy Weapon Brought Down the 9/11 Towers”
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. This theory was already laid to rest when its main proponent, Dr. Judy Wood, failed to explain what “dustification” is and admitted that it has never been demonstrated in a lab or anywhere else. When challenged on the nature of “dustification” Dr. Wood attempted to explain by talking about matter changing from solid to liquid to gas using heat, but she could not explain “dustification” other than to say that it was the result of directed energy weapons used on 9/11.
This story has been parroted by disinfo outlets like Veterans Today. Gordon Duff is on record saying that 40% of what he prints is simply not true.
Why use DEW to “dustify” the towers when the Israeli art students were fully capable of applying thermite beam cutters – known, non-extraordinary technology? When investigating a crime you determine motive, means, and opportunity. The artstudents+thermite theory covers all of those. The DEW theory fails the means test, and is therefore unlikely to be true.
If you research the Engineers and ARchitects for 9/11, Richard Gage, et. all leading it, you’ll find they previously worked at the Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah where DEW is tested along with Anthrax used on 9/11. I’ll stick with Dr. Woods, Mark Passio and some guy named Telsa, which the gov’t had his technology for 60 years.
If you were to read her book, you would find the word “dustification” defined, it is a term she made up to describe the resulting effect, so to criticize a new terminology is trite and erroneous. No steel was left standing, no large mass of debris, and it looks like it was pulverized. Also, just a few blocks away in Manhattan is a DEW facility.
If your mind is unwilling to consider this likelihood, no amount of evidence will change your thinking and instead do an ad hominen attack ala Dane Wigginton at Geoengineeringwatch.org who everyone said he was crazy and a lone wolf a decade ago and now he is proven way to right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Engineers and ARchitects for 9/11 (sic), Richard Gage, et. all leading it, you’ll find they previously worked at the Dugway Proving Grounds”
I googled “Richard Gage Dugway Proving Grounds” and could not find anything supporting your assertion – in fact this page came up as the second hit. Other than you, I don’t even see anybody making the accusation. Can you provide any sort of support for your assertion?
“Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah where DEW is tested along with Anthrax used on 9/11”
They do indeed work on Anthrax at Dugway. However the Anthrax used right after 9/11 was from Fort Detrick in Maryland, where Dr. Philip Zack framed Dr. Bruce Ivins for the attack. Ivins later committed suicide.
I googled “Dugway Proving Grounds Directed Energy Weapons” and this page was the first hit. I could not find any confirmation for your assertion, only other bloggers making the same claim. Anyone can say anything on the Internet.
“If you were to read her book, you would find the word “dustification” defined”
If it is that simple, why was she not able to explain it when questioned by a physicist? If it is defined in her book, which you have presumably read, then it should be a simple matter for you to repeat the definition.
Please watch the Interview Dr. Wood did with Dr. Greg Jenkins. As I stated, Dr. Wood is not able to explain what “dustification” is supposed to be, and she admits that it has never been demonstrated, anywhere, laboratory or otherwise, anywhere but on 9/11.
And, I’m sorry, but that’s not plausible or credible.
part 1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJZrj0leylc
part 2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEGXojifyD4
part 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY9HpE6QHCY
“the word “dustification” defined, it is a term she made up to describe the resulting effect, so to criticize a new terminology is trite and erroneous.”
Precisely – she made up the term, and she is unable to define what it is or how it happens – she just made it up. Your ad hominem is noted.
“just a few blocks away in Manhattan is a DEW facility.”
I know that Tesla’s works were sequestered by the government in Manhattan until the 1950s, but, once again, using google I could find nothing to back up your assertion that there is a directed energy weapon facility in Manhattan. Can you provide any evidence for your assertion?
“do an ad hominen attack ala Dane Wigginton”
Sir, it is you who has engaged in ad hominem. Everything I have said I have said respectfully. If you feel disrespected simply by having someone point out that what you are saying is wrong, that does not mean I have engaged in ad hominem. Also, I have said nothing about Dane Wigginton and don’t understand his relevance to what we are discussing here.
“If your mind is unwilling to consider this likelihood”
My mind is perfectly willing to consider all possibilities. However, the rules of logic and reason are what we use to determine what is most likely to have happened.
If I have one sock out of a pair missing and two theories are presented – one saying I left the other sock in the dryer, and the other saying that aliens broke into my house and stole the sock – the less extraordinary theory is more likely to be true. Furthermore, in order to convince me that the alien explanation is the real one, I would have to be presented with evidence of very extraordinary things, like the existence of aliens, their ability to break into my house, what reason they have for taking an interest in my sock, etc. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
To bring down the towers, nukes were not needed. DEWs were not needed. All that was needed was to cut the beams at the right places at the right time and to set off explosives in the right places at the right time. The motive, means, and opportunity for the Israeli art students is all crystal clear. This remains the most likely explanation of the events in question.
There has been a lot said to discredit Judy Wood, largely by the truth movement. This movement is a controlled movement. Designed to steer people away from EM weapons and no planes (CGI) The government are happy for people to speculate they were involved with the destruction of the towers but would rather keep secret the use of weapons that are unknown th the general public..they need to keep these things under wraps as CGI will play a big part for them in the near future!
I’m a victim of gang stalking ELECTRONIC HARRASSMENT, this is servere TORTURE no HUMAN BEING SHOULD EVER EXPERIENCE THIS INHUMAN TORTURE! PRAYING THAT ALL GOOD SENETERS STOP THIS ILLEGAL GANG STALKING ELECTRONIC HARRASSMENT IMMEDIATELY! THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE BEING TORTURED BY THIS INVISIBLE DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS! AND THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE GETTING SICK FROM THIS TECH AND DO NOT KNOW ABOUT INVISIBLE DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS! THIS VIDEO IS THE BEST WAY TO UNDERSTAND THE INVISIBLE DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS! HOPEFULLY PEOPLE WILL FIGHT TO STOP THIS TECH AND GET THEM OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE BAD PEOPLE!