Valid the Impaler???
“If it really is the Land of the Free and if, as is claimed, anyone really can become the president, you would fairly expect that the 43 presidents from George Washington to George W. Bush would express that genetic diversity. You’re having a laugh. The presidents of the United States are as much a royal dynasty as anything in Europe, from whence their bloodlines came.” -David Icke, “Tales from the Time Loop”
Have you ever wondered why John Kerry, Dick Cheney, the Bush’s, the Clintons et. al never go out of office or come back for term after term after term?
(Jeb Bush may run in ’16, Hilary Clinton leaves Sec. of State for Presidential run?)
Why do the Bushes, Reagan, Alan Greenspan, Rudy Guiliani, General Wesley Clark, Casper Weinberger etc. all make a point to go to England to be knighted by the Queen into the Highest Royal Order for their ‘service’?
Every wonder why someone in Hollywood ‘makes it’ big time, while others, with also exceptional talent, do not?
It’s all in the blood, folks. Their negative blood types to be exact because negative and negative bloods keep the lineage pure.
The powers that should not be believe that keeping it in the family creates a superior race of Man. They have religiously preserved the lineage for hundreds, perhaps thousands of years. Hitler wanted his ‘Aryan’ race, the Royal family only interbreeds, so it is not too far of a stretch to understand that every single President has been of related royal blood lines.
All our Presidents are related by blood. Elections are pure charades between common blood lineage dating back to
In my atte
to King John, the signer of the Magna Carta
mpts to expose the genealogical “royal” bloodline – the passing of pure blood type as opposed to mere genealogical “family tree” relation – I came across a researcher from Ancestry.com named Tim Dowling. On his site, and reproduced below, Mr. Dowling has connected the trees of all U.S. Presidents to the Plantagenet King John circa 12oo A.D.
DIRECTIONS: To see the full charts or tree for each president, click on the “Relationship to King John” link below, and then on the next page click either the “tree” link or the link below that which looks like this:
Ancestry of George Washington, President up to John of England, King See
This presentation will hopefully satisfy those who were not satisfied with my previous presentation of mere cousin relationships between all U.S. Presidents, which can partially be found at this link: http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html
Please click on the links in this chart for detailed geneology connections to the “royal” blood, and remember…
“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”
–Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”
All Presidents are Related
(click on header to order poster showing genealogy., Great gift for history teachers to ponder)
Though one can argue, ‘everyone’ is related, there is strong imperical and evidential evidence that our Presidents, and those that oppose them in ‘elections’ are all related by blood, though it is hard to prove since DNA and bloodtypes are seriously protected and secret. However, if a 12 year old girl can connect the dots…..
If America declared its Independence from the European monarchies in 1776, how is it possible that every single president has descended from European monarchs? If presidents are democratically elected as we are told, what are the odds that American’s always choose members of British and French royal bloodlines?
“The Americas have always been owned and governed by the same royal families of Britain and Europe that conventional history states as being among those defeated during the wars of so-called ‘Independence.’” -Michael Tsarion, “Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology”
The below video finds a young girl in California who has put together a Presidential Family Tree. Twelve-year-old BridgeAnne d’Avignon found that all the presidents but one are related to King John of England through a common ancestor. “They are all cousins and all grandsons of John Lackland” (King John of England) BridgeAnne told KCOY News. The girl searched more than a half million names for months. She started with George Washington, then traced both the male and female family lines to make the connection.
In order to create the family tree, the 12-year-old spent months scouring through over 500,000 names in search of the ‘presidential Adam.’Her 80-year-old grandfather, who has been tracing roots for nearly six decades, helped her make the presidential links. D’Avignon started with the first U.S. president, George Washington, she traced both the male and female family lines to make the connection. Prior to d’Avignon’s discovery, genealogists were only able to link 22 families of presidents, likely because they only focused on male bloodlines.
Bush is closely related to the king of Albania and has kinship with every member of the British royal family and the House of Windsor. He is related to 20 British Dukes, the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth. He is 13th cousin once removed from Prince Charles and has direct descent from King Henry III, Charles II, and Edward I of England. Through the House of Windsor and King Henry III, the Bush’s and Bill Clinton are genetically related as well.
- Since we know that the United States of America, is the a D.C. corporation, owned by the ‘Crown’ of England and the fact that this country has been ruled by Maritime law under the “Holy See” of the Vatican, it is not a too far stretch at all to understand that every single appointment of U.S. Presidents are related and carry only a negative blood type traced back to the ancestral Royal bloodlines.
- Further proof that we are still under British/International rule in this country and have been since its founding.
- Further proof that elections in this country are irrelevant, all elections are only theater to distract and give illusion to the sheeple that they have a choice.
- Further proof of a shadow government at work and a not so more hidden Agenda.
- Further proof that a massive, treasonous fraud is still ongoing in this country today and 99.9% of Americans are clueless as to this truth.
Published: July 05, 1988
Vice President Bush may be narrowly trailing Gov. Michael S. Dukakis in the opinion polls, but he is far ahead according to another indicator of Presidential prospects: the ”royalty factor.”
”Going by the statistics of the past, Mr. Bush will be the next President of the United States,” said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke’s Peerage Ltd., the 162-year-old directory of British nobility. Burke’s Peerage today released a report tracing the Vice President’s family tree to the 1400’s. The study by Burke’s senior genealogist, Roger Powell, and an American colleague, William Ward, found that Mr. Bush has more connections to British and European royalty than any President of the United States. Queen’s 13th Cousin
For example, Mr. Bush is a 13th cousin of Queen Elizabeth II and is related to all members of the British royal family, according to Burke’s genealogists. Moreover, he is related to all those who have married into the British royal family, like the Queen Mother, the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of York. Mr. Bush is also related to all current European monarchs on or off the throne, including the King of Albania.
To the unenlightened, this lofty lineage may seem worlds apart from the back-slapping, baby-kissing spectacle of American Presidential races. But the royalty factor cannot be easily disregarded, if the past is any guide, Burke’s officials say. Of the 40 American Presidents, 13 have had a direct connection to European royalty. The frequency with which royal blood has found its way into the White House is much higher than the share of the American population with links to British or European monarchs, which is estimated at less than 5 percent. In short, American Presidents have been at least six times more likely to have royal blood than the people who elected them.
The royalty factor, Mr. Brooks-Baker suggests, is a genetic phenomenon. ‘‘The genes or chromosomes for leaders come forward whether it’s kings or presidents,” he said. ”You cannot hold back the genes.”
In the case of the Vice President’s genes, Burke’s Peerage traced the Bush family tree to the 1400’s. Mr. Bush is a direct descendant of King Henry VII, of one of Charles II’s mistresses and of Henry VIII’s younger sister, Mary, who married King Louis XII of France. His American Roots Charles II’s mistress Barbara Villiers lived from 1641 to 1706 and was a sixth cousin of the Vice President’s great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother, Elizabeth Wellington Fay, Mr. Brooks-Baker said.
Miss Villiers’s liaison with the King lasted 12 years and she had seven children, of whom only five were publicy acknowledged as his. Mr. Bush’s American roots were planted by Dr. Richard Palgrave, his grandfather seven times removed, who came to America in 1630, Mr. Brooks-Baker said.
According to Burke’s, which has traced the genealogy of American Presidential families for years, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and John Quincy Adams were all related to Edward I. In the 20th century, Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt were descended from Dutch nobility. Jimmy Carter has kinship ties to noble Scottish and English families, while President Reagan is a direct descendant of the 11th-century High King of Ireland, Brian Boru. If elected, Mr. Bush would be the ”most royal” of any American president. For now, that distinction belongs to George Washington. ‘Typical Yankee Family’
In the past, Burke’s has published its genealogical reports on American politicians after they are elected President. But, Mr. Brooks-Baker said, the Vice President comes from ”a typical old Yankee family,” which promised several royal links, so the interest of the Burke’s genealogists was piqued and they went ahead before the election. Burke’s has not yet done a genealogical study of the Dukakis family tree. However, Mr. Brooks-Baker is dubious about finding anything to rival the Bush wealth of royal connections. ”The son of a Greek immigrant – the chance of getting very far with him is remote,” he said. ”Poor George,” said Kevin Phillips, a Republican political analyst. ”For an American politician trying to increase his popularity with the American public, it can’t be too helpful to have the issue of royal lineage raised.”
By placing bloodline members on both sides of America’s faux political dichotomy,
the old monarchs have guaranteed their right to throne under the guise of democratic elections.
Don’t Trust the NY Times or a 12 yr. old? How about Obama and Cheney themselves?
NEW YORK — President Barack Obama has family ties to none other than Sarah Palin, according to the genealogists at Ancestry.com, a discovery the family history site made when looking for connections between political foes. And that’s not all – Obama also is apparently related to conservative radio host and relentless critic Rush Limbaugh.
A genealogist at the Utah-based Ancestry.com, Anastasia Tyler, said Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor named John Smith, a pastor and early settler in 17th-century Massachusetts. Obama is related to Smith through his mother, as is Palin, Tyler said.
Ancestry.com has revealed in the past that Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt. It has also found that Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate, is a distant cousin of both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.
President George W. Bush is not only the son of President Bush the Elder, but he is related to his Vice President (Cheney) AND the presumptive next President (Obama) AND ALSO Bush’s former opponent for president (Kerry), who each have over-lapping ties to his genealogy. It is clear that not just anyone can grow up to be president, despite the hopeful illusion.
Instead, it is all too obvious that one likely must share a common pedigree to some degree, not only genetically, but socially, economically– in other words, must hold a pass into the inner-ring of the ruling class based on background connections. The President is also related to powerful celebrity elites including actors Brad Pitt, Tom Hanks, Marilyn Monroe, and top celebrities Madonna, Celine Dion and Hugh Hefner.
Ok so this Greenberg / Zuckerberg thing is getting weirder by the second. A Jacob Greenberg was arrested for possession of Marijuana and this mugshot was taken. It was later revealed that this could indeed be the man the world knows as Mark Zuckerberg. His family members include David Rockefeller, his Grandfather. A little strange because Rothschild owns 8% of Facebook shares. Both Rothschild and Rockefeller are well known names and his other granpa….Hank Greenberg…former CEO of AIG.
Fyi, Facebook was funded with $500 million from a CIA owned bank, which was a bit suspicious. I wonder if Google has similar disguised progeny. Zuckerberg means ‘sugar mountain’
“The Americas have always been owned and governed by the same royal families of Britain and Europe that conventional history states as being among those defeated during the wars of so-called ‘Independence.’” -Michael Tsarion, “Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology”
“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” says Brooks-Baker. Some of the governor’s royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana. His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II, who shared the governor’s vision of a strong military. Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush’s maiden name is Pierce] were high society. “Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he notes.
Gore’s family members weren’t exactly peasants. The vice president’s family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors. And a good fight wouldn’t frighten the vice president’s most famous ancestor, England’s Edward I – best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart. Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European
royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson.
As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe. Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said. “But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”
What about Bill Cinton ? In an Associated Press article published in The Daily Oklahoman, October 28, 1996, Harold Brooks-Baker said: “Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back, on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.
Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the current British royal family. Clinton’s royal roots include several medieval monarchs and Simon de Montford, a statesman and soldier under King Henry III. Through de Montford, Clinton is related to every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”
In the same article, the journalist revealed that “Bill Clinton’s family goes back to William Henry Harrison and Benjamin Harrison, making him related to Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. His kinship to Ford makes him ‘near kin’ to Richard Nixon and George Bush.”
Small world, isn’t it? And this seems to be a jealous guarded secret as over the past years, the President had all records of his family history, school records, medical history, etc. sealed.
If you think all these are mere coincidence see the charts below. And if you think it’s just a probability game, then check your own genealogy and those of all the people you know. Do you have such great chance to be even far cousin with Bush, Nixon, Kerry, Clinton ?
Still think that the Democratic Revolution has changed the Aristocratic Governments ? Now think twice :).
What is the true secret of the ruling class? What does it mean to be “related by blood”? Is it possible that just one royal family rules over this entire planet? Were our “founding fathers” really who they are portrayed to be in our history books?
The proof of these strange and disturbing facts are laid out in this sourced and incredibly disturbing 4.5 hour audio presentation. I beg of you to learn the truth about our collective middle-class consumer-enslavement to this small percentage of the human population.
Listen in parts or all at once; but please, please, please listen.
Download and share freely without copyright here:
“According to Burke’s Peerage, even according to the official genealogy, Bill Clinton is genetically related to the House of Windsor, the present royal family in Britain; to every Scottish monarch; to King Henry III of England; and to Robert I of France.” -David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center”
Researchers like David Icke, Michael Tsarion, and Fritz Springmeier, along with foundations like the New England Historical Genealogy Society, Burkes Peerage, the Roman Piso Homepage, and other reliable genealogical sources have documented these royal presidential bloodlines. Actually, by branching out far enough on the presidential family tree, the dedicated researcher will find that all 44 presidents share kinship, belonging to the same general ancestry, often called the 13th Illuminati bloodline, the Merovingian line, and/or the Windsor-Bush bloodline.
Burke’s Peerage & Baronetage and Burke’s Landed Gentry have, for 175 years, recorded the genealogies of the UK and Ireland’s titled and landed families. Often referred to as ‘the aristocracy bible’, these are without comparison as a genealogical reference to the influential figures and families of Great Britain and Ireland.
According to Burke’s Peerage, even according to the official genealogy, Bill Clinton is genetically related to the House of Windsor, the present royal family in Britain; to every Scottish monarch; to King Henry III of England; and to Robert I of France.” -David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center”
In 2004 George W. Bush ran as a “Republican” against “Democrat” John Forbes Kerry – his 16th cousin. These cousins, related to the same British and French monarchs, are also secret society brothers in the infamous Skull and Bones fraternity. John Kerry descends from King Henry II of England and Richard the Lionheart, leader of the third Christian crusade in 1189. He also has links to royalty in Albania, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Persia, and France, but still not enough royal genes to top George Bush. Earlier in 2000 we see the same story – George W. Bush ran neck and neck with Al Gore; another supposed democrat and cousin of the Bush family.
“Al Gore is a descendant of Edward I, Roman Emperors Louis I, II, and Charles II and is direct descendant of Charlemagne which makes him a distant cousin of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. So the top “democratic” candidates against Bush in 2000 and 2004 were actually his cousins!” -Michael Tsarion, “Where History Ends DVD”
“Never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances. There has always been a significant “royal factor,” in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among others, all boasting blue blood links. Al Gore…a descendant of Edward I, he is also a cousin of former U.S. President Richard Nixon, who resigned from the White House in 1974 for his part in the Watergate scandal. However, Al Gore does have direct links to the Holy Roman Empire. He is descendant of Roman Emperors Louis II, Charles II, and Louis I and is therefore also a direct descendant of Charlemagne, the eighth-century Emperor. The problem is that Gore’s Charlemagne links also make him a cousin of George W. Bush.” -Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage Publishing Director from p. 7, NEXUS magazine, Vol. 8, No 1, January-February edition
By placing bloodline members on both sides of America’s faux political dichotomy, the old monarchs have guaranteed their right to throne under the guise of democratic elections. Back in 1996 we see the same tactic as “Democrat” Bill Clinton defeated “Republican” Bob Dole, his cousin.
“Even Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, who ‘opposed’ each other at the 1996 election, are distant cousins. They can trace their ancestry to England’s King Henry III, who reigned from 1227 to 1273, and US Presidents William Henry and Benjamin Harrison …Clinton has far more royal blood than Dole and is directly descended from the same bloodline as the House of Windsor, every Scottish monarch, and King Robert I of France. This is why he was the Brotherhood’s choice.” -David Icke, “The Biggest Secret” (191-192)
“Father George and wife Barbara [Bush] are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount … Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline …So when George W. Bush, a descendant of the de Bouillon through his mother and father, talked of a “Crusade” against “Islamic” terrorism…this was no slip of the tongue…as was reported” – David Icke “Alice In Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster”
The British line goes back from Prince William and Harry, through Prince Charles and Princess Diana, to Queen Elizabeth II, King George VI and V, King Edward VII, Queen Victoria, King Edward III, II, I, and King George III, II, I. Then it passes through King James I who ordered and financed the now most-widely read version of the Bible. Before James came Mary Stuart, King Henry III, II, I, King John (signer of the Magna Carta) and back to the Plantagenet and Habsburg dynasties under the Roman Empire. Other branches carried the bloodline to Scotland, Austria, Germany, Spain, Sweden and even Mexico:
“This same bloodline also includes key Scottish families like the Lords of Galloway and the Comyns; Marie-Louise of Austria, who married Napoleon Bonaparte; Kaiser Wilhelm II, the king of Germany at the time of the First World War; and Maximilian, the Habsburg emperor of Mexico, who died in 1867. On and on it goes into country after country. This bloodline connects into every surviving royal family in Europe, including King Juan Carlos of Spain and the Dutch, Swedish, and Danish royal lines.” -David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline”
The human body contains approximately 6 quarts (or 5.6 liters) of blood.
- In one day, your blood travels nearly 12,000 miles.
- Your heart beats around 35 million times per year.
- Your heart pumps a million barrels of blood during the average lifetime — enough to fill three supertankers.
(Negative blood, especially RH Negative, has a higher copper content then positive iron blood, which is where ‘Blue blood’ actually comes from. Bush was awarded the Presidency in ’04 because he had more ‘blue blood’ then Gore.)
recorded since 1834 for noble birth or descent; it is also known as a translation of the Spanish phrase sangre azul, which described the Spanish royal family and other high nobility who claimed to be of Visigothic descent, in contrast to the Moors. The idiom originates from ancient and medieval societies of Europe and distinguishes an upper class(whose superficial veins appeared blue through their untanned skin) from a working class of the time. The latter consisted mainly of agricultural peasants who spent most of their time working outdoors and thus had tanned skin, through which superficial veins appear less prominently. The genesis of the blue blood concept: It was the Spaniards who gave the world the notion that an aristocrat’s blood is not red but blue. The Spanish nobility started taking shape around the ninth century in classic military fashion, occupying land as warriors on horseback. They were to continue the process for more than five hundred years, clawing back sections of the peninsula from its Moorish occupiers, and a nobleman demonstrated his pedigree by holding up his sword arm to display the filigree of blue-blooded veins beneath his pale skin—proof that his birth had not been contaminated by the dark-skinned enemy.
Former U.S Presidents
Former President Eisenhower Type O-Neg
Former President John F. Kennedy Type AB-Neg
Former President Richard Nixon Type O-Neg
Former President Bill Clinton AB-Neg
Former President George W. Bush Sr. Type A-Neg
Pharaoh Ramses II Type B-Neg
Shroud Of Turin was AB-Neg is this correct?
Prince Charles Type O-Neg and his late Grandmother
Queen Elizabeth Type O-Neg
Prince William is also negative
(Only Negative and Negative blood can keep a pure bloodline intact. Any positive type blood will make it impure and break the lineage. It is believed by many that all Presidents are of negative blood type, though I could not confirm it anywhere.}
|Negative/Positive||Neg/Neg, Neg/Pos||Neg/Pos, Pos/Pos||Neg/Neg, Neg/Pos, Pos/Pos|
(Have you noticed that the Royal Family has only Sons and the last three Presidents (Obama, Bush and Clinton) have only had Daughters???)
Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is a universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and positive. This is called the RH factor. The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor. If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do not have the factor in your blood. The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.
When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is known that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human or animal characteristic passed on to the off spring. There are VERY few aberrations. It rarely changes.
Most people, about 85%, have RH-positive blood. That could support the idea that humans evolved or were derived from Primates. 15 % of humans have RH-negative blood. If blood type is one of least mutable human characteristic, where did the RH negative come from? This question has puzzled scientists for years. There is some evidence that suggests the RH-negative blood group may have appeared about 35,000 years ago. And the appearance was regional and seemed to, originally, be connected with certain groups/tribes of people.
Northern Spain and Southern France is where you can find some of the highest concentration of the RH-negative factor in the Basque people. Another original group were the Eastern/Oriental Jews. In general, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the RH-negative group. Only about 3% of African descendent and about 1% of Asian or Native American descendent has the RH-negative group. Due to the larger European numbers, it is a safe bet that was where it was introduced into the human genetic code. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor.
If the RH-negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when a mother of the RH-negative blood group gives birth to an RH-positive blood group baby. This Hemolytic disease, actually an allergic reaction, can cause death when the two different blood groups are mingled during pregnancy. When the antigenic substances attack the negative blood group it can destroy the blood cells. So why does the human body produce antigens to this blood type? Is the blood group alien?
The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when donkeys and horses are crossed to produce mules. This is not ‘natural’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed. Only with intervention would this happen. Was there a cross breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?
People with RH-negative blood group have certain characteristics that seem to be common among the majority. Here is a brief list of the most common.
¨ Extra vertebra.
¨ Higher than average IQ
¨ More sensitive vision and other senses.
¨ Lower body temperature
¨ Higher blood pressure
¨ Increased occurrence of psychic/intuitive abilities
¨ Predominantly blue, green, or Hazel eyes
¨ Red or reddish hair
¨ Has increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
¨ Cannot be cloned
¨ Alien Abduction and other unexplained phenomenon
The appearance of RH-negative blood did not follow the usual evolutionary path. In fact, evolution would seem to be ruled out as a possible cause of the anomaly. It has been proven that blood is the least likely to mutate. There are no other blood mutations. The introduction of the RH-negative blood type was not a naturally occurring part of human evolution.
This would lend credence that the RH-negative factor was introduced from an outside source. Could the source be from human like beings from another planet? Or maybe we are just as alien as they are, in that, we are a product of their manipulation and interference. Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to create modern man?
Many ancient texts, including, the Bible, do support this theory. Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race that from the Heavens to the Earth Came. And they created man in their image. Man saw them as gods, living long lives and performing miracles. Flying about in the sky ships and shooting fire and creating ear-shattering booms. The humans watched as these gods built massive and glorious houses and created beautiful cities for themselves. From mans primitive point of view, they were gods. But that was early man’s point of view.
Who were the gods? The ancient stories tell us a lot about these gods. They obviously had advanced technology capable of space travel and air travel. They knew about aviation, metallurgy, the universe, the cosmic progression, medicine and evidently genetics. They knew about atomic energy and weapons and used them. Evidence of this can be found on Earth. They knew about agriculture and how to create more nutritious grains and other food staples. All of the basic grains that humans rely on for food have been determined to have all appeared at the same time spanning roughly a 10,000 year period. A very short time, geologically speaking. And no new grain has since been developed.
Our ancient texts tell us they began to take humans for their spouses. The Bible says, and the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their wives. They had children, many children. But not all humans were a result of interbreeding. The first human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the gods’ genes. The first humans were not a product of interbreeding. But small portions of humans are a result of this interbreeding and their blood type can support this.
In the first part of this article, I described to you what happens when two species who similar but genetically different interbreed. They produce hybrids. The example I gave was about horses, donkeys, and mules. Mules are the hybrid, the product of a union between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic relationship between the horse and the donkey.
When humans were first created, they were a product of two genetically similar but not related species.
The combination of the DNA of the primates and the gods was produced ‘artificially’ in a lab. If the gods have the technology to create a new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile. A little genetic manipulation and it would no longer be an issue.
Three proto types of humans were created. Each one successively more advanced. Two types by design and the last by chance. Nethaderal Man is suspected of being an early humanoid created by the gods but cro-magnon was definitely a product of their intervention. The next type is whom we call pre-human and then we have modern man. Modern man was a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans. This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line that inherited, from their godly parents, the RH-negative blood type.
This is supported by the fact that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey. They did not inherit it because one of their parents did not have the monkey protein. This protein is present only because combining primate DNA with DNA from the gods created the original human proto-type that carried the monkey protein.
So in conclusion, I suggest that man is a creation of a highly technological race of human like beings that From the Heavens to the Earth came. I suggest that these advanced beings are still among us today and are still very active in the affairs of man. To what end, I can only suggest.
Discover the amazing role these bloodlines have played – and are now wielding – in human history, with family names such as:
Reagan was made an Honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, the highest honor that Britain gives to Americans. (Reagan was one of only three presidents awarded the knighthood – the other two being Eisenhower and George H.W. Bush.)
“I can’t say how proud I am,” Reagan said outside the palace as he held a box containing the accoutrements of his honorific – a star, a badge and a sash.
“Don’t drop them,” warned the Queen.
The Original 13th Article of Amendment
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
Newsday February 20, 2002 LAST WEDNESDAY, as protocol dictates, “bowing from the head, not the waist” to Queen Elizabeth, “Sir” Rudy Giuliani joined Billy Graham, Steven Spielberg, IBM’s Lou Gerstner, Ronald Reagan, Norman Schwarzkopf and other knightly relics of the British attempt to persuade Washington that the “special” relationship between the two countries means something more than Tony Blair’s doing what he’s told – sometimes even before he’s asked.
However, as “Sir” Rudy received his gong (medal) from the British queen, he had more relevant role models as an “honorary” Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. For example, one other previous honorary knight was Rumanian dictator Nicolae Ceaucescu, who was honored for buying British even as he drove his people to poverty and desperation. Ceaucescu didn’t like term limits either, and he also tried to hang on to office, until the crowds in Bucharest eliminated him.
George Bush, former U.S. President, appointed Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath by H.M. Queen Elizabeth.
Ronald Reagan, former U.S. President, appointed Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath by H.M. Queen Elizabeth.
Caspar Weinberger, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, appointed Knight Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire by H.M. Queen Elizabeth.
Final Report on Iran/Contra: Part VIII
Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger lied to investigators to conceal his knowledge of the Iran arms sales. Contrary to Weinberger’s assertions, a small group of senior civilian officials and m…
John Paul Getty II, U.S. billionaire businessman, appointed Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire by H.M. Queen Elizabeth.
Foley, Tom: Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. March 19, 1995. Member, Order of the British Empire. Foly also holds the French Legion of Honor and the German Order of Merit. Source: AP news release. The OBE was given by Sir Robin Renwick, the British Ambassador to the United States with these words: “I am ordered by Her Majesty the Queen to invest you with the Order of Knight of the British Empire.” Without further ceremony, Sir Robin then placed the neck decoration upon Foley. According to the AP news release, Foley cannot use the chivalric prenominal, but can use the OBE postnominal.
Fed Chief Greenspan to Be Knighted
Tuesday, August 6, 2002; 4:48 PM
WASHINGTON –– He won’t get to call himself “Sir Alan” but Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan – often known as the second most powerful man in the United States – will get another title: knight.
Queen Elizabeth II has approved an honorary knighthood for Greenspan’s “outstanding contribution to global economic stability,” the British Treasury announced Tuesday. A copy of the release was distributed in Washington.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51226-2002Aug6.html site down
Being ‘of Service’ to Whom Exactly??
WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is about to violate the U.S. Constitution by accepting an honorary knighthood.
Because Greenspan is not a citizen of the United Kingdom it will be an “honorary” knighthood and he will not be able to use the title “sir,” but the knighthood still comes under Article I, Section 9 of the U.S Constitution. “No person holding any office of profit or trust under [the United States], shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign state.”
Greenspan has been warned by the Southeastern Legal Foundation, an Atlanta-based constitutional public interest law firm, that he should “follow the letter and intent of the U.S. Constitution” before agreeing to accept an honorary knighthood from British Queen Elizabeth II.
“Mr. Greenspan, as the U.S. government’s appointed head for fiscal and monetary policy, must seek the consent of Congress before receiving a British title,” said Phil Kent, SLF president. “Our Founding Fathers were unequivocal when it comes to the matter of U.S. government officials receiving honors and titles from foreign powers – you just can’t do it, without the express approval of Congress, which serves as a check against potential conflicts of interest.”
Kent points out that former U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, as well as former New York City Mayor Rudolph Guiliani, received similar honorary knighthoods – after they left public office. “The rich history of British acknowledgment of American service to world freedom and prosperity should continue, but it must continue according to the U.S. Constitution, to which we owe our allegiance,” said Kent.
There is no word from Greenspan on his plans.
First Lady Michelle Obama always suspected that she had white ancestors. But she had no idea who they were. With DNA testing and research, I was able to solve that mystery and finally identify the white forbears who had remained hidden in her family tree for more than a century.
All across the country, growing numbers of people are turning to DNA testing as a tool to help unlock the secrets of their roots, using companies such as ancestry.com, among others. When I started researching my new book, “American Tapestry: The Story of the Black, White and Multiracial Ancestors of Michelle Obama,’’ I pored over historical documents that I found in local archives, courthouses and libraries as well as records that I found online on ancestry.com and other state and local databases. But I knew that DNA testing would be the only way to unearth the truth.
I suspected that Mrs. Obama’s white ancestors belonged to the white Shields family that had owned her great-great-great grandmother, Melvinia Shields. So I persuaded several descendants of the black and white Shields to do DNA testing. The results showed that the two families were related. The DNA testing indicated that Melvinia’s owner’s son was the likely father of Melvinia’s biracial child, Dolphus Shields. (Dolphus Shields is the first lady’s great-great grandfather.)
This was painful news for many of the Shields descendants. They knew that that Melvinia might have been raped and that their kinship originated during slavery, one of the darkest chapters of our history. But last month, members of both sides of the family – black and white — put aside the pain of the past. They got together for the very first time in Rex, Georgia at a ceremony to commemorate Melvinia’s life. They swapped family stories, posed for photographs, exchanged phone numbers and had a meal together.
Today, genealogy ranks second only to porn as the most searched topic online. According to a January 2012 report by market research firm Global Industry Analysts, an estimated 84 million people around the world spend anywhere from $1,000 to $18,000 a year in search of their ancestors. Visitors to online genealogy sites are mostly white women, 55 and older, who browse the Internet from home—or, says Pate, “your Aunt Betsy, who’s got a real rabid appetite for digging into family roots.” It’s a demographic projected to grow 36 percent by 2020, three times as fast as any other group.
In July, Ancestry.com (ACOM) announced that it had uncovered evidence that links President Barack Obama, through his white Kansan mother, to one of the earliest known slaves in North America. Obama’s also related to Brad Pitt. The genealogical website says they’re ninth cousins. Warren Buffett is family, too. He’s Obama’s seventh cousin, three times removed. In recent years Ancestry.com has also connected Obama to Sarah Palin, George W. Bush, even Rush Limbaugh—and they’ve got the paper trail to prove it.
Ultimately, drawing connections between Hollywood stars—or anyone, for that matter—is playing with a stacked deck. The reason is the exponential nature of genealogy. Assume that families have an average of two kids. Each parent will have two children, four grandchildren, eight great-grandchildren, 16 great-great-grandchildren, and so on. After 10 generations, or about 250 years, the average person will have 1,024 descendants. Between 10 and 15 generations is the inflection point, says science journalist Steve Olson, at which “the number of your ancestors explodes to be most of the population living in a specific part of the world.” Practically all people of European descent share at least one common ancestor on their family trees sometime within the last 550 years
(you don’t ‘make it’ unless it is in the genes!)